There are several fundamental physics experiments whose results contradict official cosmology. They are not disproven — they are ignored.
Designed to measure Earth's motion through the aether. Result: Null. Instead of questioning Earth's motion, the aether was abolished.
Proved that the speed of light depends on the observer's rotation. Directly contradicts special relativity. Used today in ring laser gyroscopes and GPS, but the cosmological implications are suppressed.
Meant to prove Earth's motion through stellar aberration. Instead showed that the stars move and the Earth stands still.
In each case, the experiment was not questioned — the interpretation was adjusted to preserve the Copernican worldview.
When the data doesn't fit the theory — should you question the data or the theory?